Ovarian Cancer Isn't Just a White Woman's Disease.

This Viewpoint highlights the need for recognition that ovarian cancer affects women from racial and ethnic minority groups worldwide and that the rates of ovarian cancer are increasing in those populations while decreasing among White women.

An SGO commentary: U.S. News and World Report gynecologic oncology procedural ratings-Do they reflect high-quality care?

▪ ▪ ▪.

Federal Transportation Regulations Limit Access to Clinical Trials and Oncology Care.

This Viewpoint discusses how improving accessibility to oncology services will lead to more equitable care for patients with cancer.

Variation in telemedicine usage in gynecologic cancer: Are we widening or narrowing disparities?

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine rapidly increased with the COVID-19 pandemic and could reduce cancer care disparities. Our objective was to evaluate sociodemographic (race, insurance), patient, health system, and cancer factors associated with telemedicine use in gynecologic cancers. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer with at least one visit from March 2020 to October 2021, using a real-world electronic health record-derived database, representing approximately 800 sites in US academic (14%) and community practices (86%). We used multivariable Poisson regression modeling to analyze the association of ever using telemedicine with patient, sociodemographic, health system, and cancer factors. RESULTS: Of 3950 patients with ovarian cancer, 1119 (28.3%) had at least one telemedicine visit. Of 2510 patients with endometrial cancer, 720 (28.7%) had at least one telemedicine visit. At community cancer practices, patients who identified as Black were less likely to have a telemedicine visit than patients who identified as white in both ovarian and endometrial cancer (Ovarian: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.9; Endometrial: RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83). Patients in the Southeast, Midwest, West, and Puerto Rico were less likely to have telemedicine visits than patients in the Northeast. Uninsured patients were less likely, and patients with Medicare were more likely, to have one or more telemedicine visit than patients with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort study, <30% of patients ever used telemedicine, and significant racial and regional disparities existed in utilization. Telemedicine expansion efforts should include programs to improve equity in access to telemedicine.

Prior authorization for FDA-approved PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer.

Objectives: PARP inhibitors (PARP-I) improve survival in ovarian cancer, especially in patients with germline or somatic BRCA mutations or other homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). With high efficacy and costs, insurers may enact barriers or facilitators to PARP-I. Our objective was to examine the prevalence of prior authorization for PARP-I in ovarian cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with ovarian cancer prescribed a PARP-I within the University of Pennsylvania practices from December 2018 through May 2021. We assessed prevalence of prior authorization for PARP-I overall, by frontline or recurrent maintenance, and by genetic status. We then assessed approval and appeal rates and time to PARP-I start. Results: Of 180 patients with a PARP-I prescription and information regarding prior authorization, 116 (64 %, 95 % CI 57-71) experienced prior authorization. Of patients in the frontline setting, 60 of 90 (67 %, 95 % CI 56-76) experienced prior authorization. Of patients prescribed PARP-I in recurrence, 55 of 85 (65 %, 95 % CI 54-74) experienced prior authorization. Having a germline or somatic genetic mutation was associated with higher risk of prior authorization (adjusted risk ratio 1.35, 95 %CI 1.09-1.67). 102 patients (89 %, 95 % CI 83-94) required one appeal, 8 required two appeals and 5 cases required 3 appeals. Five patients were denied. Mean time from PARP-I prescription to PARP-I start was 10 days longer for patients who experienced prior authorization. Conclusions: 64% of patients experienced prior authorization for PARP-I. Risk of prior authorization was increased for patients with BRCA, despite greater clinical benefit. Prior authorization contributes to delays in care, and reform is needed.

Treatment of node-positive endometrial cancer: chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.

OPINION STATEMENT: The standard of treatment for node-positive endometrial cancer (FIGO Stage IIIC) in North America has been systemic therapy with or without additional external beam radiation therapy (RT) given as pelvic or extended field RT. However, this treatment paradigm is rapidly evolving with improvements in systemic chemotherapy, the emergence of targeted therapies, and improved molecular characterization of these tumors. The biggest question facing providers regarding management of stage IIIC endometrial cancer at this time is: what is the best management strategy to use with regard to combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, other targeted therapeutics, and radiation that will maximize clinical benefit and minimize toxicities for the best patient outcomes? While clinicians await the results of ongoing clinical trials regarding combined immunotherapy/RT as well as management based on molecular classification, we must make decisions regarding the best treatment combinations for our patients. Based on the available literature, we are offering stage IIIC patients without measurable disease postoperatively both adjuvant chemotherapy and IMRT with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and with or without pembrolizumab/dostarlimab as primary adjuvant therapy. Patients with measurable disease post operatively, high risk histologies, or stage IV disease receive chemoimmunotherapy, and vaginal brachytherapy is added for those with uterine risk factors for vaginal recurrence. In the setting of endometrioid EC recurrence more than 6 months after treatment, patients with pelvic nodal and vaginal recurrence are offered IMRT and brachytherapy without chemotherapy. For measurable recurrence not suitable for pelvic radiation alone, chemoimmunotherapy is preferred as standard of care.

Molecular landscape of ERBB2/HER2 gene amplification among patients with gynecologic malignancies; clinical implications and future directions.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the prevalence of ERBB2/HER2 gene amplification among patients with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: The American Association of Cancer Research (AACR) Genomics Evidence of Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) (version 13.1) database was accessed and patients with endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer were identified. Patients with available data on the presence of copy-number gene alterations were selected for further analysis. Incidence of ERBB2 amplification following stratification by tumor site and histology was evaluated. Data from the OncoKB database, as provided by cBioPortal, was utilized to determine presence of pathogenic genomic alterations. RESULTS: A total of 6961 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified: 49.1% with ovarian cancer, 45.2% with endometrial cancer and 5.7% with cervical cancer respectively. Overall incidence of ERBB2 amplification was 3.8%. Highest incidence of ERBB2 amplification was observed among patients with mucinous ovarian (14.4%), uterine serous (13.2%), uterine clear cell (9.4%), and uterine carcinosarcoma (7.9%). ERBB2 amplification was rare among patients with TP53 wild-type endometrioid endometrial cancer (0.4%). High incidence of mutations in genes of the PI3K pathway was observed among patients with ERBB2 amplified tumors. CONCLUSION: ERBB2 amplification is frequently encountered among patients with uterine serous carcinoma, and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. In addition, a high incidence was also observed among those with uterine clear cell carcinoma, and uterine carcinosarcoma. For patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, incidence of ERBB2 amplification is low, especially in the absence of TP53 mutations.

Impact of delayed interval cytoreductive surgery on the survival of patients with advanced stage high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to use real-world data to investigate the impact of delayed interval cytoreductive surgery on the survival of patients with advanced stage high-grade ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: We accessed the National Cancer Database and identified patients diagnosed between 2004-2015 with advanced stage high-grade ovarian carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent interval cytoreductive surgery. Based on timing between surgery and chemotherapy administration patients were categorized into standard (9-13.0 weeks) and delayed (13.01-26 weeks) interval cytoreductive surgery groups. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test and a Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders. RESULTS: We identified a total of 5051 patients; 2389 (47.3%) and 2662 (52.7%) in the standard and delayed interval cytoreductive surgery groups respectively. There was no difference in complete gross resection rates (53.2% vs 54.5%, p=0.51). Patients in the delayed interval cytoreductive surgery group were less likely to undergo complex surgery (39.3% vs 45.6%, p<0.001) and had lower rates of unplanned re-admission (4.1% vs 2.6%, p=0.003). There was no difference in overall survival between the standard and delayed interval cytoreductive surgery groups, p=0.13 (median 34.3 vs 33.9 months) even after controlling for confounders (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.97, 1.12). There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups for patients with no gross residual (p=0.95; median overall survival 40.08 vs 39.8 months) or gross residual disease (p=0.16; median overall survival 32.89 and 32.16 months). CONCLUSION: For patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer delayed interval cytoreductive surgery may not be associated with worse overall survival.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the overall survival of patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery with known residual disease status and had at least 1 month of follow-up were identified in the National Cancer Database. Adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as receipt of chemotherapy within 6 months of surgery. Overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori-selected confounders. A systematic review of the literature was also performed. RESULTS: In total, 618 patients with stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery were identified; 501 (81.1%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, while 117 (18.9%) patients did not. The median follow-up of the present cohort was 47.97 months. There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.78; 4-year overall survival rates were 77.5% and 76.1%, respectively). After controlling for patient age, medical co-morbidities, disease stage, and residual disease status, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.38). Based on data from three retrospective studies, omission of adjuvant chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery was not associated with worse progression-free survival benefit (HR=1.25, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.95) for patients with stage III-V low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy may not be associated with an overall survival benefit for patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery.

Role of immunotherapy for lymph node positive vulvar melanoma: utilization and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utilization and outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients with vulvar melanoma and inguinal lymph node metastases. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with vulvar melanoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who did not have distant metastases, underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, had positive lymph nodes, and at least 1 month of follow-up were identified. Administration of immunotherapy was evaluated and clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Median overall survival was compared with the log-rank test. Stratified analysis based on clinical status of lymph nodes was performed. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were identified; the rate of immunotherapy use was 25% (75 patients). Patients who received immunotherapy were younger (median 58 vs 70 years, p<0.001); however, the two groups were comparable in terms of clinical lymph node status, rate of positive tumor margins, presence of tumor ulceration, tumor size, Breslow thickness, and performance of comprehensive lymphadenectomy. There was no overall survival difference between patients who did (median 31.08 months) and did not (median 22.77 months) receive immunotherapy (p=0.18). Following stratification by clinical lymph node status, immunotherapy did not improve overall survival of patients with clinically negative (median 35.35 vs 33.22, p=0.75) or positive lymph nodes (median 23.33 vs 16.99, p=0.64). After controlling for confounders, administration of immunotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14). CONCLUSIONS: In this study approximately one in four patients received adjuvant immunotherapy. Immunotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival.

Telehealth utilization in gynecologic oncology clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth visits and remote clinical trial operations (such as local collection of laboratory tests or imaging studies) were underutilized in gynecologic oncology clinical trials. Current literature on these operational changes provides anecdotal experience and expert opinion with few studies describing patient-level safety data. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of telehealth and remote clinical trial operations during the COVID-19 Pandemic. METHODS: Gynecologic oncology patients enrolled and actively receiving treatment on a clinical trial at a single, academic institution during the designated pre-Telehealth and Telehealth periods were identified. Patients with at least 1 provider or research coordinator telehealth visit were included. Patient demographics, health system encounters, adverse events, and protocol deviations were collected. Pairwise comparisons were performed between the pre-Telehealth and Telehealth period with each patient serving as their own control. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Virtual provider visits and off-site laboratory testing increased during the Telehealth period. Delays in provider visits, imaging, and laboratory testing did not differ between time periods. Total and minor protocol deviations increased in incidence during the Telehealth period and were due to documentation of telehealth and deferment of non-therapeutic testing. Major protocol deviations, emergency department visits, admissions, and severe adverse events were of low incidence and did not differ between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth and remote clinical trial operations appeared safe and did not compromise clinical trial protocols in a small, single institutional study. Larger scale evaluations of such trial adaptations should be performed to determine continued utility following the Pandemic.

Next generation sequencing reveals a high prevalence of pathogenic mutations in homologous recombination DNA damage repair genes among patients with uterine sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the incidence of homologous recombination DNA damage response (HR-DDR) genomic alterations among patients with uterine sarcoma. METHODS: The American Association for Cancer Research GENIE v13.0 database was accessed and patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma, adenosarcoma, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and endometrial stromal sarcoma not otherwise specified were identified. We determined the incidence of pathogenic alterations in the following genes involved in HR-DDR: ATM, ARID1A, ATRX, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRCA2, BRCA1, BRIP1, CHEK2, CHEK1, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCL, MRE11, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, WRN. Data from the OncoKB database, as provided by cBioPortal, was utilized to determine the presence of pathogenic genomic alterations. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients contributing with 525 samples were identified. Median patient age at sample collection was 56 years while the majority were White (80.7%). The most common histologic subtype was leiomyosarcoma (63.8%) followed by adenosarcoma (12.3%). The overall incidence of HR-DDR genomic alterations was 28.2%. The most commonly altered genes were ATRX (18.2%), BRCA2 (4%), and RAD51B (2.6%). The highest incidence of HR-DDR genomic alterations was observed among patients with leiomyosarcoma (35.4%), adenosarcoma (27%) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (30%), while those with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma had the lowest (2.9%) incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 3 patients with uterine sarcoma harbor a pathogenic alteration in HR-DDR genes. Incidence is high among patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma and adenosarcoma.

Insurance status and time to radiation care after pathologic diagnosis for cervical cancer patients.

Delays in starting potentially curative treatment for locally-advanced cervical cancer (LACC) decrease survival. Reasons for these delays are poorly understood. We conducted a retrospective chart review examining disparities in time from diagnosis of LACC to first clinic visit and to initiation of treatment based on insurance status within a single health system. We analyzed time to treatment using multivariate regression, adjusted for race, age, and insurance status. 25% of patients had Medicaid and 53% had private insurance. Having Medicaid was associated with delayed time from diagnosis to seeing a radiation oncologist (Mean 76.9 v. 31.3 days, p = 0.03). However, time from first radiation oncology visit to starting radiation was not delayed (Mean 22.6 v. 22.2 days, p = 0.67). Patients with locally-advanced cervical cancer and Medicaid had over double the time from pathologic diagnosis of cervical cancer to seeing radiation oncology; insurance disparities were not observed in treatment start after seeing radiation oncology. Improved referral and navigation processes for patients with Medicaid are needed to improve timely receipt of radiation and potentially improve survival.

Disparities in clinical trial participation in ovarian cancer: A real-world analysis.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparities exist in clinical trial participation in non-gynecologic cancers, but little is known about disparities in ovarian cancer trial participation. Our objective was to examine patient, sociodemographic (race/ethnicity, insurance), cancer, and health system factors associated with clinical trial participation in ovarian cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed from 2011 to 2021, using a real-world electronic health record derived database, representing around 800 sites of care in US academic and community practices. We used multivariable Poisson regression modeling to analyze the association of ever participating in an ovarian cancer clinical drug trial with patient, sociodemographic, health system, and cancer factors. RESULTS: Of the 7540 patients with ovarian cancer, 5.0% (95% CI 4.5-5.5) ever participated in a clinical drug trial. Patients of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity were 71% less likely to participate in clinical trials (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.61) than non-Hispanic patients, and patients whose race was unknown or other than Black or White were 40% less likely to participate in clinical trials (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89). Patients who had Medicaid insurance were 51% less likely (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.87) and those with Medicare were 32% (RR 0.48-0.97) less likely to participate in clinical trials than privately-insured patients. CONCLUSION: In this national cohort study, only 5% of patients with ovarian cancer participated in clinical drug trials. Interventions are needed to decrease race, ethnicity, and insurance disparities in clinical trial participation.

Insurance and racial disparities in prior authorization in gynecologic oncology.

While prior authorization aims to reduce unnecessary care, it may limit or delay medically necessary care. Delays in cancer care can impact survival and are more common in historically-marginalized populations. Our objective was to examine to what extent disparities occurred in prior authorizations for gynecologic oncology. Using electronic medical records, we performed a retrospective review of prior authorization occurrence during gynecologic oncology care and analyzed the association with patient race and insurance in a multivariate regression model. In this cohort of 1,406 patients treated at an academic gynecologic oncology practice, patients with Medicare Advantage and patients of Asian descent were more likely to experience prior authorization. Addressing insurance-mediate disparities, such as in the occurrence of prior authorization, may help reduce disparities in gynecologic cancer care.

Facility level variation in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with higher surgical morbidity for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate outcomes for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients based on facility-level utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: Stage III-IV EOC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Percentage of patients managed with NACT was calculated for facilities, reporting ≥120 patients. Facilities with lowest and highest quartile of NACT rate comprised the low and high-utilizing groups. Clinico-pathological characteristics were collected, and appropriate statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: High- and low-utilizing facilities managed on average 54.1% and 25.4% of patients with NACT respectively. Patients managed at high-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65 (p = 0.029), have stage IV disease (p < 0.001) and comorbidities (p < 0.001). Patients managed with primary debulking surgery (PDS) at low-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65, have stage IV disease, and have comorbidities (all, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing PDS at low-utilizing facilities were significantly less likely to achieve complete gross resection (p < 0.001), and were significantly more likely to experience 90-day mortality (p < 0.001), and unplanned 30-day readmission (p < 0.001). After controlling for age, comorbidities, race, insurance status, stage, grade and histology, high-utilizing facilities trended towards better overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99). Overall, patients undergoing PDS had better OS compared to those who had NACT (median 42 vs 27 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite treating an EOC population with more advanced disease and comorbidities, high-utilizing facilities have lower surgical morbidity and mortality with no detrimental impact on long-term survival. Careful patient selection to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with PDS is pivotal.

Prior authorization in gynecologic oncology: An analysis of clinical impact.

BACKGROUND: Prior authorization was designed to minimize unnecessary care and reduce spending but has been associated with delays in necessary care. Our objective was to estimate the occurrence of prior authorization, and impact on cancer care, in gynecologic oncology. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients seen in University of Pennsylvania gynecologic oncology practices (January-March 2021). Using electronic medical records, we measured the incidence of prior authorization during the 3-month period and prior experience of prior authorization for cancer care overall and by type of order (chemotherapy, imaging, surgery, prescription drugs). We assessed the impact of prior authorization occurrence on clinical outcomes (time to service, changes in care). RESULTS: Of the 2112 clinic visits of 1406 unique patients, 5% experienced prior authorization during the 3-month study period. An additional 20% faced prior authorization requests earlier in cancer care. Of the 83 prior authorization requests, imaging accounted for the majority (54%) followed by supportive medications (29%) and chemotherapy (17%). After appeal, 79% of cases were approved. For patients whose prior authorizations were approved, there was a mean of 16 days from order placement to care delivery (95% CI 11-20, range 0-98 days). Of the 17 denials, 3 (18%) led to a substantial change in care (i.e., not receiving planned treatment). CONCLUSION: 25% of gynecologic oncology patients experienced prior authorization during their cancer care. While 80% of claims were ultimately approved, patients experienced over a 2-week delay in care when prior authorization occurred. Reform is needed to reduce the burden of prior authorization in oncology.

Predictive value of 5-Factor modified frailty index in Oncologic and benign hysterectomies.

Background: The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) has been validated against the original 11-factor modified frailty index in gynecologic surgery, however its utility has not been evaluated between benign versus gynecologic oncology patient populations. Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the mFI-5 in identifying women at increased risk for major postoperative complications, readmission, or death within 30 days of hysterectomy for benign and oncologic indications. Methods: Patients who underwent hysterectomy between 2015 and 2017 were identified from the NSQIP database and stratified into benign or malignant indications. Demographic and mFI-5 variables were extracted. The mFI-5 was calculated by dividing the sum of all affirmative variables by the total number of input variables in the database. Logistic regression modeling was performed adjusting for confounders. C-statistic with 95% CI was obtained post-regression. Results: 80,293 hysterectomies (59,078 benign and 21,215 oncologic) were identified. The benign group was more likely to have an mFI-5 score of 0 (70 % vs 50 %, p = 0.001) and had shorter operative times (p = 0.001). In the benign group, mFI-5 was a strong predictor of mortality (c = 0.819, CI 0.704-0.933). Within the oncology group, the mFI-5 was a strong predictor of mortality (c = 0.801, CI 0.750-0.851), particularly for uterine and cervical cancers. It was moderately predictive of readmission (c = 0.671, CI 0.656-0.686) and strongly predictive of Clavien-Dindo class III and IV complications (c = 0.732, CI 0.713-0.750). Conclusion: The mFI-5 is a strong predictor of 30-day mortality and serious postoperative complications. These findings have the potential to improve identification of high-risk patients in the preoperative setting.

Addition of External Beam Radiation Therapy to Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage IIIC Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma: Utilization and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether the addition of external beam radiation (EBRT) to adjuvant chemotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy is associated with better survival for patients with stage IIIC endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma, without a history of another tumor, who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy and had positive lymph nodes were identified in the National Cancer Database. Those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (defined as receipt of treatment within 6 mo from surgery) and had at least 1 month of follow-up were selected for further analysis. Overall survival was compared between patients who did and did not receive EBRT within 6 months from surgery with the log-rank test. A Cox model was also constructed to control for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 3116 patients were identified; 1458 (46.8%) received chemotherapy without and 1658 (53.2%) with EBRT. Pathologic characteristics (tumor grade, size, endocervical, and lymph-vascular invasion) were comparable between the two groups. Patients who received external beam radiation had better survival compared with those who did not, P =0.001; 5-year overall survival rates were 83.1% and 77.9%, respectively. After controlling for patient age, race, presence of comorbidities, insurance status, tumor size, grade and endocervical invasion, and the presence of lymph-vascular invasion, the addition of EBRT was associated with a survival benefit (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma metastatic to the lymph nodes, addition of external beam radiation to adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with a survival benefit.